Open Access Accesso aperto  Accesso limitato Abbonamento o accesso libero

Chastity and Respect for Human Life

Stephan Kampowski


In his encyclical Evangelium Vitae, Saint John Paul II claims that “the trivialization of sexuality is among the principal factors which have led to contempt for new life” (EV 97). The present essay examines the plausibility of this assertion. It looks at the sociological evidence on the relationship between contraception and abortion, which is not as unambiguous as is sometimes claimed. The analysis then turns to G.E.M. Anscombe’s insistence on moral knowledge as connatural, with evident repercussions on the abortion debate, given the debate’s considerable practical implications. Barring access to abortion would require a substantial change in today’s sexual mores, which are themselves based on the separation between sexuality and procreation consequent to the broad availability of effective contraceptives. This separation is so radical that some authors can give influential accounts of pregnancy and abortion without any reference to sexual intercourse. As long as, due to people’s sexual customs, ready access to abortion is perceived indispensable, it will be hard for them to acknowledge the contempt for new human life involved in it. To remedy abortion—and the disregard for human life in general—one would thus have to begin by challenging the prevailing sexual mores, seeking to recover sexuality’s inherent connection to procreation, which is one of the essential aspects of the virtue of chastity.

Full Text




  • Non ci sono refbacks, per ora.

Indicizzato da


Incoraggiamo i lettori a iscriversi al servizio di notifica di questa rivista. Usa il link Registra in alto alla homepage della rivista. Con questa registrazione il lettore riceverà l'indice per email di ogni nuova uscita della rivista. Vedi la dichiarazione sulla privacy della rivista che assicura il lettori che il loro nome e indirizzo email non sarà usato per altri fini.